100-Million-Year-Old Fossilized Human Finger Baffled The Scientific Community

According to conventional anthropology, the oldest human fossil is 2.8 million years old. However, a number of discoveries that just do not match, such as this 100 million-year-old petrified human finger, call this theory into question.

A quarry owner discovered the out-of-place fossil in a gravel mound in the mid-1980s. The pebbles and fossilized finger were mined from a Cretaceous limestone rock in Texas.

Previous dinosaur fossils discovered in the region indicated that the deposit was roughly 100 million years old.

Paleontologists found that soft tissue must have been immediately buried in an oxygen-free environment for the finger and its owner to become petrified. Individual cells would mineralize independently and their minute characteristics would be retained in a rapid burial.

If this is true, the man to whom this finger formerly belonged must have died violently. Add to that the fact that fossils only occur under extreme conditions, and it was sheer chance that led to this finding.

A diamond saw was used to cut the fossilized finger, revealing its distinct interior structures, which were arranged in concentric circles.

CAT scans showed other evidence, such as the presence of bones, joints, and tendons inside the finger. Because their densities differed, they appeared as darker patches on the X-ray.


CAT analysis revealed remains of bones, joints and tendons.

Although researchers are unable to determine who the finger belongs to or what species it belonged to, it is highly unlikely that it belonged to primates.

The puzzle remains as to how a 100 million-year-old petrified finger could exist. Did an unknown human race exist on Earth 100 million years ago? Is it feasible that the so-called “out-of-place artifacts” aren’t so out of place after all?

A third possibility is the existence of time-travelers. This would surely explain all of the perplexing out-of-place artifacts discovered all around the world.

All of this begs the question: will discoveries like this one lead to a paradigm shift at some time, or will they all turn out to be hoaxes or incorrectly classified items?

Of course, we must consider the possibility that this is merely another scam, an elaborate farce.

However, if this revelation is true, it would imply one of two possibilities: either humans have been present for much longer than we thought, or our planet’s past has been computed incorrectly.

Latest from Articles